Who doesn't remember, more or less fondly, the “horror flick” 'Anaconda'?
Big snake eats film crew and ruthless hunter (sorry for spoilers).
So what could be more obvious than to increase this horror even further?
Especially since, fortunately, the jungles of the world still have something mysterious about them and one expects and perhaps even hopes for many natural wonders in them. In the case of the copy we have here, however, the author suffered from a runaway imagination or was mentally at a loss with the relationships.
But let's first look at the picture:
A huge snake does what snakes usually do, it snakes around. Quite a few people stand in and around a body of water. Both are rather harmless in themselves, even if the snake is an anaconda.
What seems strange, however, is that the snaking snake winds its way through the crowd of people, who strangely seem unimpressed by it. It snakes its way up one person's bottom, and here too there is no reaction of any kind.
A snake whose diameter reaches up to a person's butt is actually something that a gathering of people cannot ignore the body part just mentioned.
But why don't people react?
The snake seems kind of blurry, is it a stealth anaconda? Invisible to humans and radar? Or does she move as quickly as “the red lightning” or “The Flash”?
A colleague just interjected: “If you can’t crop properly, you soften the edges…”. Well or so, but that means the photo is a fake - kind of disappointing, I found a “Flash Anaconda” kind of appealing.
After all, according to the German text, it is said to have killed 257 people and 2,325 animals, resulting in the remarkable length of 40.8 m and a weight of 2,067 kg. British commandos wrestled with the beast for 37 days before killing it. – Respect!
But even more entertaining is the English version “World's biggest snake Anaconda found in Africa's Amazon river.” Ok, that was probably before the first continental drift, but how do we bring the British commandos (in the English version “Africa's Royal British Commandos”) ) in the story below? Probably not at all.
Result:
I don't think I'm going too far when I say that this story is a hoax, and a bad one at that, or a story where the author wanted to see how many people got confused Story so he can secretly make fun of her, but then he definitely had fun.
Further sources:
If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:
📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.
Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!
* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!
Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )



