Was National Council member Andreas Glarner (SVP) intentionally duped by banning Cervelat?

This is what happened: The Swiss National Council member Andreas Glarner (SVP) published a status report on July 3, 2018 with the information that he received a call from a disappointed mother who received a message that her children would not have cervelats (sic ) can bring with you.

This resulted in quite a big story; the youth group and the ban have never been proven to this day. Only a parent letter from a school with a request could be taken into account, but this was not the original claim ( compare ).

Now, however, the online satirical magazine Beta-Show deluxe claims that Glarner was intentionally allowed to appear:

There is still no sufficient evidence from the video that a satirical campaign was started here that Glarner fell victim to. We therefore contacted Beta-Show deluxe and asked.

Is this really an action on your part (is there any evidence?) or are we dealing with a false flag action, which wouldn't happen for the first time.

At this point we would like to thank Beta-Show deluxe for the answer, because we are well aware that the team has had to answer many questions in the last few days.

The team in Switzerland is not aware of a Cervelat ban either. Beta-Show deluxe replied to us that unfortunately Glarner had not checked this fact or even asked it critically after he got the call. Our goal at Beta Show is to start a discussion about how to handle sources. Nevertheless, they regretfully stated to us that they could not provide sufficient proof. The implementation would already be described in the video.

Media reports published at the same time expressed cautious doubts, as there was simply no evidence whatsoever. On the Nau.ch website you can read that you have already been in contact with the operators, but have not received a sufficient answer:

However, the alleged satirists provide no evidence. When asked, moderator Lukas Blatter said there was neither a telephone recording nor could his team provide screenshots of the telephone call at the correct time with Glarner's cell phone number. He also couldn't give out the number of the alleged mother. This would have allowed the story to be verified.
nau.ch

Therefore, it remains unclear at this point whether Glarner fell for an online satirical magazine or whether it is a fake-fake campaign. The Cervelat ban definitely made us think.


If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:

📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.

Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!

* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!


Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )