Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to amazing developments in many areas, from health diagnostics to the creative arts. But what about copyright when an image or work of art is created not by a human but by a machine? A recent ruling in the US has brought this question into the spotlight and could set the course for the future of AI in art and the media world.

The Challenge of Copyright in the AI ​​Era

With the development of artificial intelligence and its application in the art world, many questions have arisen regarding the copyrights of AI-generated works. Who owns the rights to an image created by an algorithm and not a human artist? This was recently heard in a US court.

The Case of “A Recent Entrance to Paradise”

Stephen Thaler, head of AI developer Imagination Engines, led a lawsuit claiming that the artwork created by his artificial intelligence, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” should be copyrightable. However, the US Copyright Office had a different opinion, arguing that human creativity is a central element in protecting a work.

The “ghost painter” argument

Thaler compared AI-generated art to art created by a so-called “ghost painter” or other contract artists. In his opinion, it shouldn't make any difference who or what creates the artwork as long as it is unique and original.

The court ruling and its implications

However, the US courts that considered the case concluded that the essence of copyright law must be an act of human creativity, and that this creativity is not present in a work created by an artificial intelligence. This ruling could have far-reaching implications, particularly in the US film industry, where AI technology is increasingly being used.

Consequences for the media and film industry

Screenwriters, actors and other creative professionals could be encouraged by this ruling, as their human creativity cannot be replaced by machines. However, it could also pose challenges for film studios if they use AI in their production and then find that they may not have full copyrights to their works.

The debate about copyrights and AI is far from over. But this recent ruling offers a first glimpse into the legal views and could pave the way for future discussions and decisions in this exciting and ever-evolving area. It remains to be seen how the creative rights landscape will evolve as technology advances.


Also read: Facebook: The secrets behind “Suggestions for you”

Source:

The Hollywood Reporter


If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:

📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.

Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!

* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!


Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )