The claim
Poisoned food samples from Fressnapf are being distributed based on an alert directly from Fressnapf claiming that these samples were intended to be distributed in northern Germany and there is concrete evidence of the poisoning.
Our conclusion
No poisonous food sample has ever been detected. The original post, from 2016, relied on conjecture, the warning was inaccurate as to the location, and no evidence of poisoned food was ever found.
Do you know that feeling when a story is so captivating and frightening that it sends shivers down your spine? One such story that persists and resurfaces from time to time like a ghost from the past is the legendary tale of poisoned food bowl food samples. This story is spreading like wildfire, leaving people worried about their furry companions. But before we let fear take over, let's dive deep into the facts and unmask the truth behind this urban legend.
Fressnapf's poisoned trap that never existed: A look at the facts
As we delve into the world of pets, we can't help but worry about their health and safety. In the midst of these worries, however, a dark shadowy figure keeps appearing: the claim that Fressnapf food samples are poisoned and could harm our beloved four-legged friends. It's like a nightmare that keeps coming back and fuels our fears.
But before we let this fear overwhelm us, let's take a close look at the facts. The origins of this story date back to 2016 , when a warning appeared on a Facebook page. Apparently poisonous food samples were circulating in the “Northern German area”. Sounds worrying, doesn't it? But here the devil is in the details, because these claims were vague and unconfirmed from the start and are now making the rounds again 8 years later, we are writing at the end of August 2023:
The status post as wording (sic!) "Dear animal owners, small test samples of Fressnapf are currently being thrown into the mailboxes, don't give any to your animals because it is poison. The animal haters have new methods and are throwing poisoned treats into the mailboxes as originally packaged"


The Power of Speculation: How Conjecture Became a Legend
The story of the poisoned Fressnapf food samples began with information from a single branch. In February 2016 , the Facebook page “Fressnapf Solingen Werderstrasse” issued a warning that was based on pure speculation. There was talk of packages that had allegedly been sent and warnings about potentially manipulated food. Doesn't sound particularly convincing, does it?

The uncertainty and ambiguity of this warning are obvious. The use of words such as “alleged” and “presumably” shows a lack of specificity. And here is the point at which a legend was forged from conjecture. A sharepic here, a status post there, and the story gains momentum. But keep your curiosity in check, because we haven't reached the end of this expose yet.
The Power of the Viral Spiral: How the Legend Keeps Turning
It's amazing how quickly rumors and speculation can spread in the digital age. The warning about the poisoned Fressnapf food samples reached a viral intensity that could hardly be contained. But as the story spread like wildfire, one crucial question remained unanswered: Is there really any evidence to support these claims?
The answer is: no. No poisoned Fressnapf food samples have ever been detected in either Germany or Austria. Even Fressnapf itself was forced to react to the viral spread. They asked recipients of food samples to bring them to their stores for testing. But even after five years, these allegedly poisoned samples remained a mere fiction.
The Devil in the Details: What the Facts Really Say
Let's get the facts straight: There is no credible evidence of poisoned Fressnapf food samples. What began as a vague warning became an urban legend that persists. Even when individual Fressnapf branches provided vague evidence, concrete evidence of manipulated food was never found.
The Long-Term Legend: A Myth That Resists
Now, after EIGHT long years since the warning first emerged, convincing evidence of a poisoned feed package is still lacking. This throws us into the vortex of an all too familiar situation - the emergence of an urban legend that feeds on the power of its own narrative.
When the idea of poisonous bowl food samples was brought into play, the warning inevitably took on a dazzling level of drama. This caused it to spread rapidly in the digital world. The unstoppable virality of this story was unleashed and has endured to this day. A wave that goes its own way and sticks in people's minds.
Conclusion: When the truth drowns out the barking
In a world where information can travel at lightning speed, it's more important than ever to separate fact from fiction. The story of poisoned food samples shows how easily assumptions and speculation can become a legend. It is our responsibility to remain skeptical and look for evidence before falling into the trap of fear.
So while the shadows of the past may rise in the form of this urban legend, don't let the darkness guide you. Hold the leash of reason firmly in your hand and remember that the truth is often far less sensational than the legends that surround it.
Fact check: Poisoned food samples
| Claims | Fact check |
|---|---|
| Poisoned food samples from Fressnapf are distributed | No poisonous food sample has ever been detected |
| The warning comes directly from Fressnapf | Original post was based on conjecture |
| The food samples were to be distributed in northern Germany | The warning was imprecise and did not name a specific location |
| There was concrete evidence of the poisoning | No evidence of poisoned food was ever found |
Why this story should teach us
Fake news is not just a phenomenon of politics or major scandals. They can come across us in our daily lives and directly affect our loved ones, our pets. The example of the Fressnapf food samples shows how important it is to question information critically and not to blindly trust every warning.
Conclusion . The truth behind the urban legend about poisoned food samples from Fressnapf? It is based on rumors and half-truths. While the intention behind such warnings is often well-intentioned, we should all double-check before spreading such stories. Because in the end it's not just about our own reputation, but about the well-being of our four-legged friends.
Copy, Save and Share:

Also read: When social media replaces facts with pop psychology
If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:
📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.
Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!
* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!
Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )

