MIMIKAMA

I'm finally sitting here at the head of my table again, with a guilty conscience plaguing me and I could really complain about the unyielding fate if it would be of some use and not just lead to a literal "Amen - clickbaiting". So I leave it alone, am happy that some of my readers are still there and raise my written voice to say, what exactly?

Karma is a bitch but something like that

At this point I actually wanted to talk about the new ones in the Bundestag, not about these right-wing radical ones, yes they are new too and offer astonishing, bizarre and sometimes inhumane quotes. No, I noticed the newcomers from the formerly established and former popular parties. Air taxis and the like, there would have been so much to discuss, the text had begun, a lively exchange of ideas was raging in my head and then... then the general flu wave swept me away and threw me with a flourish, but as I would like to point out at this point would like to go to the hospital bed, not without a certain elegance on my part.

Of course, events and reality overtook me more or less quickly, I rejected my text, but rest assured, I will definitely keep an eye on the gang, although that sounds somehow unhealthy, a peep in the eye, but well, I have to get through it . Everyone knows that Angela Merkel has placed one of her critics in one of the most thankless positions in the cabinet and has thrown him into the wind, so to speak. Of course, a politician always tries to make a name for himself with pithy words and everyone on the new bench has certainly not covered themselves in fame, at least not verbally. We don't have to give them a leap of faith, we should just avoid nitpicking about it and give them a chance to at least try to do it better? Perhaps.

But what we should definitely do is not judge them by their words, but by their actions, and they still have a few years to do that.

One thing you have to admit to them without envy, however, is that they have already spread so much verbal garbage that at the end of the legislative period you will probably say retroactively: "Oh, it wasn't that bad after all, I had feared worse at the beginning."

In doing so, I have, unnoticed, at least brought the final chord of my rejected article to the readership.

The attentive reader becomes noticeably uneasy at this point. What does the writer actually mean by the headline?

Well, sporty as I am, I don't mean THE Bavarians, they are definitely a multicultural team, of course you can argue about them, but not here and now. I'm with Bayern, more specifically with the CSU, they've had it terribly in the cross for quite some time now, but not in the middle but rather half diagonally to the right, from there you sat, i.e. the CSU, namely the AfD in the same, i.e. the cross and That is disgraceful and downright treason, such a Bavarian regional treason, after all, the Mao Tse Tung of Bavaria, Franz Josef Strauss, once said: “There should be no democratically legitimized party to the right of the CSU.” Yes, it’s kind of stupid that then because in the slipstream of the CSU's own arrogance and understandability, the AfD grew like mold on the right-wing abyss, making every effort to appear democratically legitimate, apart from a number of confusing mistakes that have now reached the point where they can be described as right-wing radicals with judicial approval . Right-wing radical, but STILL democratically legitimized. Franz Josef will turn in his grave if his CSU doesn't slowly take democratically legitimate countermeasures.

Great idea, but how?

If you approach the matter logically, or if we just call the child by its name, politically naive, then, Little Fritzchen thinks, we will listen to the citizens' concerns and take these concerns into account. Unemployment, pension provision, health, peace, the environment - the concerns of citizens are varied, but real and tangible and most of them even understandable. Of course there are regional differences, the coastal residents of the Lower Saxony lowlands are more likely to think about the effects of the deepening of the Elbe on the environment than, for example, the residents of the Bavarian plateau, which is why, after not too much thought, it is quite understandable that the Bavarian CSU has so far has decided not to include the deepening of the Elbe as a point in its election program. Whereas securing the slopes of one or two mountain sides could appear in the CSU's regional election programs, especially if a regular voter lives in the area of ​​a possible slope. It's bad to lose voters this way. Although this could certainly explain the definition of the landslide victory.

A small digression, here in Northern Germany the mountains are called dikes. In practical terms, these are usually placed side by side without any gaps, which mostly leads to the bare Hans (for those living inland - this is not a storm surge, but rather it describes the North Sea Storm surges, so Blanker Hans, the North Sea doesn't spill into the diked area during a storm surge, okay? Mountains, on the other hand, have gaps, are pointlessly high and block the view, but at least the regional party associations have something for the party program. Dikes are so important that they are rarely included in party manifestos; there is a separate authority for them. Every year there is a dike show, where selected committees and their members walk the dike and see whether it is still there... Nope, it's about raising the dike, repairing it, etc. just maintaining and securing the dike. Hauke ​​Haien sends greetings.

So, back to the naive political thinking, with a bit of luck you get reports from the grassroots and from the local associations about the specific concerns they have, and with a little tact, empathy and mental work, you could now develop a program from this. which not only inadvertently addresses voters, but also simultaneously addresses their concerns and shows them “we care.” However, this contact from the political leadership to the political client (the voter) or the powerful (all power comes from the people) is becoming more and more obscure. It seems especially so in Bavaria.

That's why we'll just look at the CSU's approach.

They, i.e. the CSU, make it extremely easy for themselves, they treat the voters who tend to vote for politically left-wing parties as lost and troublemakers per se and dedicate themselves entirely to the task assigned by Franz Mao, the destruction of all democratically legitimized ones Parties to the right of the CSU. However, as already discussed, the only thing that lives there is the AfD political mold. The CSU strategists spared themselves the mentally exhausting process of differentiating and investigating the motives of the mold voters and simply looked at the mold in the poetry album, where an “us against them” mentality was more or less cleverly instilled in the voter, fortunately not for all voters, unfortunately but to many. Seen individually, we all have this mentality within us to a certain point, otherwise millions wouldn't be able to spend their time in front of their home screens every year watching the hour-long commercial on US television, which is interrupted by music and sport and the Superbowl calls. How exciting would a football game be if the defense didn't try to stop the offense from trying to cover ten yards in four plays, but instead everyone sat peacefully on the lawn discussing the benefits of cow dung in the treatment of beard loss.

The strategists read and the CSU jumped into actionism, more power for the police, coming immediately - bang new police duties law.

While this approach to poaching voters was still relatively subtle, the mental monsters of the CSU proved that they can also, on a highly official level, fend off the right-wing radical mold and its inherent ideas. One of the fears that this corner has instilled in voters who already feel like they have been taken advantage of is that of strangers, especially those with a different religion. Religion is always possible, it's a wonderful way to play tricks. This has worked really well in the past, with some bigwigs telling their infantry that the holy city was in danger and had to be freed from the hands of whoever had something to say there at the time. So they set off, the infantry on foot, otherwise it would have been a break in style, the big heads on horseback, a picture like the cattle trek to Abilene, a herd of cattle swarmed by cowboys.

From a historical perspective, the time of the Crusades is quite an interesting one anyway. The foot soldiers marched south on a kind of forerunner of the Balkan route (with slight deviations in the south) to answer the call to liberate Jerusalem. Always pursuing the intellectual and spiritual creed “God wants it”, and of course remaining faithful to the Bible and firmly believing. The boys on horseback, on the other hand, didn't all feel the same way about faith and ideal values; they were definitely interested in worldly things, power, wealth, vice and lust. They tied chastity belts to their wives at home and thus saw their share of loyalty as well as completed. The holy places were not only freed from the religious occupiers, but also from the financial burden. The first was taken care of by the infantry, the second was dragged home by the riders, after all a horse can carry a lot more.

If you think about it carefully, a large part of today's politics has a certain similarity to the Crusades, let's take the right-wing radicals, they no longer want to liberate the holy places from the infidels, why should they, they thankfully come here, partly via the Balkan route already mentioned, what if these aren't refugees at all, but just late returnees from the Crusades? ... I digress, so they come to us with their faith, the faith that led to the liberation of the holy places back then, what could be more natural than to quickly declare their own country a holy place and once again attack this faith? The rank and file, driven by “Us against THEM” propaganda, swallows the bait and begins to rebel. While the Großkopferten sit on their horses and wait. Off to Abilene.

At this point I would like to make it very clear that I am in no way comparing the electorate, in whole or in part, to the cattle of the Chisholms Trail cattle treks. I won't, I won't, I never will! After all, a cow like that has feelings too.

The heroes of the CSU, after all, that's what it's all about, see that religion always works, so let's invoke our Crusader origins and pick up the cross and, in the same breath, nail it to the wall in the Bavarian offices as traditionally rooted. But there's a subtle sense of humor to the whole thing; if you look at the history of some of the highest dignitaries of the CSU, they didn't take the holy sacrament of marriage particularly seriously, which would somehow fit more into the hostile religion.

Nevertheless, the cross is now being nailed into the offices and buildings for the time being, so the rank and file are satisfied - at least those from the mold electorate.

Somehow I get the dull feeling that the CSU has only one thing in mind: not to uphold the ideal values ​​from some tradition, but simply to hang the electoral cross in the office so that the rank and file understand next time: “No one is allowed to the right of the CSU give a democratically legitimate party!”

It will be worth taking a closer look at the Basic Law: “There is no state church”, but if I nail religious symbols into the offices, then this is an act of establishing Christianity as the state church and somehow at the same time a violation of another fundamental right, Art . 4 GG “No one may be discriminated against because of their faith.” Here I would see the negative religious freedom applied, which was already applied in the so-called “crucifix ruling”. But the scholars will be allowed to argue about this in the next few weeks; I hope for a constitutional complaint because I would be seriously interested in the outcome of this.

What remains is the stale taste that the CSU only wants to exploit the faith again and it doesn't deserve that.


If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:

📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.

Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!

* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!


Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )