An Italian research group has allegedly found intentionally introduced cancer cells in vaccines.
NPR.News " and " Galaxy Health Council report that an Italian research group called Corvelva discovered that vaccines contain the cells of an aborted baby. Those cells are said to contain “abnormal genes”, 560 of which are said to be linked to the development of cancer, i.e. they are “cancer cells”.
Specifically, the MRC-5 cell line is said to contain these genes. The site's conclusion is that vaccines are intentionally laced with cells with cancer-causing genes to "secure repeat business for Big Pharma"; The risk of cancer would increase with every vaccination.
[mk_ad]
What exactly is MRC-5?
The abbreviation means “ Research Council cell strain 5”. They are fibroblastic cells from the lungs of a male fetus aborted . The abortion was in September 1966 because of psychological problems in the 27-year-old mother, who was otherwise physically healthy.
What does MRC-5 have to do with vaccinations?
As early as the 1960s, Leonard Hayflick discovered that viruses needed for certain vaccinations developed better than in animal tissue or live animals, as was usually the case before. Rubella viruses in particular, which are contained in a weakened form in the rubella vaccination, developed very well and quickly.
Today, two main cell lines from aborted fetuses are used for the development of a variety of vaccines:
WI-38 and the aforementioned MRC-5.
Where is the study located?
Anyone who finds themselves tangled up in scientific websites looking for the study and is slowly despairing that it cannot be found there should be reassured: the study never appeared in a specialist magazine.
a PDF file in English with 10 pages , only be found on the website of Corvelva The group itself calls the study “Vaccinegate”.
What are the specific findings in the study?
We already wrote above that many vaccines are developed in cell lines from two aborted fetuses from the 1960s and these are cell lines from the lungs. This isn't a big secret, which is why some of the study's findings are very surprising:
- The cell lines found belong to a human fetus
- The cell line appears to be very old, probably from the 1960s
- The discovered fetal DNA is a complete, individual genome, i.e. the complete DNA is contained
- That human genetic DNA is “abnormal”
- 560 genes in that DNA are linked to cancer and have been heavily modified
- Unknown genetic variations, the meaning and purpose of which are still unclear, have also been discovered
- A certain excess of genome is also abnormal
Which questions are open?
Many many. While conspiracy theorists like to assume that all scientists are in cahoots and have each other's backs, the truth is that no scientist trusts anyone else.
This means that scientific findings must be understandable and reproducible for other scientists. Otherwise you don't have a scientific study, just a bunch of claims that are simply meant to be believed. And scientists don't like to believe, they want to know , that's why they are scientists !
And that's exactly what's wrong with this study: It consists of 10 pages of allegations without even the smallest amount of evidence as to how these findings were even obtained.
An example: The study claims that the findings were obtained using NGS ( Next Generation Sequencing ), which the study calls "New Generation Sequencing" (you would actually think that scientists who use this method would too know what the abbreviation means).
- How were the samples prepared for NGS?
- How did they discover that human DNA was detectable?
- How was the DNA amplified to clearly detect it?
- How were the measurements carried out?
- Which calculation methods were used?
- How did the sequencing analysis go?
- How was it ensured that there was no cross-contamination from employees?
These are very important points for precise studies that were not taken into account in the study, which is probably one reason why it cannot be found in any scientific publications: Without answering the above points, no other scientist can understand the results.
Simply put: If a student simply writes down the results in a math test without describing the calculation method, the teacher does not know whether the student was simply using a calculator or knew the results beforehand. Then there is no good grade!
Further inconsistencies in the study
It gets even better: Since Corvelva apparently couldn't carry out some measurements itself, they say a (!) sample was sent to a laboratory in the USA (whose name they don't want to name), and the measurement results were then used.
What kind of laboratory? Why do people refuse to name it when asked? Why only one sample?
Then there are the “genetic anomalies”: Corvelva compares the supposedly found sequences with those of a normal human genome in a pie chart. What it wasn't compared to was the MRC-5 cell line. How do you know that the genome they allegedly found belongs to MRC-5, WI-38 or another cell line that is less commonly used?
And then we have the 560 cancer-causing genes. Which genes? How were they “modified”? Even if there were “modified, cancer-causing genes” in vaccinations: where should they go? Vaccinations are administered intramuscularly, so how are the genes supposed to settle in the body? Such genes are not simply incorporated into one's own DNA, and even if they were to get into a cell nucleus, a reorganization of the cell would not only be absolutely random, but also very rare: basically the most uneconomical method imaginable for treating people with cancer to infect!
Briefly touched on: the cells in the vaccinations
This is a real lottery: the viruses contained in the vaccinations are grown in fetal cell lines. When packaging vaccines, the viruses are, to put it bluntly, taken from the culture medium and bottled. However, it can happen that in rare cases even the tiniest parts of the culture medium, i.e. the fetal cell line, also get into the vaccination, which is also pointed out in the contents of vaccinations.
However, this does not that this is a rule or intention, and especially it does not mean that complete human genomes, not just cell lines from a fetal lung, are suddenly in the vaccinations.
[mk_ad]
Conclusion
The study is inaccurate in many respects. This is not the first time that the “Corvelva” research group has appeared with dubious studies, in principle it is just an Italian anti-vaccination site that tries to appear serious with pseudoscientific “studies”, but their publications consist only of claims do not meet any scientific standards.
Also interesting:
If you enjoyed this post and value the importance of well-founded information, become part of the exclusive Mimikama Club! Support our work and help us promote awareness and combat misinformation. As a club member you receive:
📬 Special Weekly Newsletter: Get exclusive content straight to your inbox.
🎥 Exclusive video* “Fact Checker Basic Course”: Learn from Andre Wolf how to recognize and combat misinformation.
📅 Early access to in-depth articles and fact checks: always be one step ahead.
📄 Bonus articles, just for you: Discover content you won't find anywhere else.
📝 Participation in webinars and workshops : Join us live or watch the recordings.
✔️ Quality exchange: Discuss safely in our comment function without trolls and bots.
Join us and become part of a community that stands for truth and clarity. Together we can make the world a little better!
* In this special course, Andre Wolf will teach you how to recognize and effectively combat misinformation. After completing the video, you have the opportunity to join our research team and actively participate in the education - an opportunity that is exclusively reserved for our club members!
Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )

