This saying that everyone knows from the fair or fair. It also fits quite well if you receive the postcard from Einskomma GmbH.

Everything looks incredibly important:

Important document (pension profit) with a reference number.

Attention Confidential, delivery only to the recipient.

Then a test seal from the PPE/Altona testing center.

clip_image002

Let's take a look at this page in detail

The card clearly states: Important Document . So, an important document?

clip_image003

Why is an important document sent as a postcard and not at least as a registered letter where you can see how the shipment is progressing?

Also, why do you send a confidential document as a postcard that can be viewed by everyone?
What is an annuity gain?
And why do you choose the “delivery form only to the recipient” that doesn’t exist for the post office?

Questions about questions

But first things first, this document can't be that important if the sender accepts the risk that it could get lost. Furthermore, the trace of the shipping route would then not be traceable.

This document is not confidential, otherwise it would not have been sent in this open form. On the contrary, you may even speculate that this card will be read by someone other than the recipient, thus maximizing the chance that someone will get in touch.

What is an annuity gain?

The sender probably wants to suggest that you will receive a monthly payment in the form of a pension.

The statement “Delivery only to the recipient” is NOT binding for the deliverer. He can simply put this postcard in the mailbox, hand it to the neighbor, etc.

If the sender had wanted delivery only to the specified recipient or to a specially authorized person, he would have had to choose the additional fee-based “Personal Hand” service. So this card can't be that important , no matter how inflated it is.

The card turned over

Let's look at the back of the letter:

clip_image005

On this page again important information and profit processing department. Some alleged data protection is pointed out several times and a total pension profit of €120,000 over 10 years is promised, which would correspond to €1000 per month.

clip_image007

Again, some questions remain unanswered.

Did I win, or is it just information that I might be one of the lucky ones? You can only find out if you call and give the reference number.

Who is behind it?

The sender is Einskomma GmbH, based in Hamburg. If you look using a search engine, you will find various entries that encourage you to buy tickets when you call the number provided. Tickets, lottery tickets.

Since it is now only permitted to contact private individuals for advertising purposes to a very limited extent, you can circumvent this forbidden cold calling by being called using bait. A very interesting piece of information about the company mentioned comes from the website /Forum Antispam

“Otherwise it will also be permissible to ask how a company deals with property, plant and equipment according to the annual financial statements of December 31, 2012.
H.v. 722.00€ and a cash balance (= federal bank balances, balances at credit institutions and checks) of 74,805.32€ and a price of 120,000€.
Be careful, nobody has anything to give away “just like that…”

Examples of letters are also shown on this page:

Part 1: http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uplo…lerwnmopgq.jpg
Part 2: http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uplo…q1asied3jt.jpg
Part 3: http://img5.fotos -hochladen.net/uplo…j6xw584mof.jpg

Conclusion:

Many different sources warn against this “raffle method”

This practice does not seem to be legally objectionable. If you receive such an “important” letter, it might make more sense for it to find its way to waste paper.

 

References:

Gutefrage.net

http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/abteilung-fuer-gewinnabentwicklung

Gutefrage.net

http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/abzocke-gewinnabentwicklung-einskomma-gmbh

Call info

http://www.ruf-info.de/04042236091

Antispam

https://www.antispam-ev.de/forum/showthread.php?36320-gewinn-Komitee-einskomma-Gmbh-Elbchaussee-26-22765-Hamburg

Caller-rating.de

http://www.rufer-vergleich.de/04042236091

German Law Forum

http://www.recht.de/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=177602

Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )