The claim

Apparently the US Supreme Court has made a ruling that does not recognize Covid vaccines as such.

Our conclusion

A thorough review shows that this story is fictional. The Supreme Court has made no such ruling, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has denied involvement in that nonexistent ruling.

The common claim

There is a claim circulating on social media that the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Covid vaccines are not vaccines. This alleged decision is often linked to the claim that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won against all pharmaceutical lobbyists. Such claims attract attention and spread quickly on the Internet, which is why careful fact-checking is necessary.

Rumors surrounding the Supreme Court verdict: truth or fiction? - Screenshot from social media
Screenshot from social media

The fact check on the alleged verdict

A review of the US Supreme Court's official website and a search of relevant keywords revealed no evidence of such a ruling. In addition, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a well-known figure in the US anti-vaccination scene, has expressly confirmed that this claim is a hoax. This was also confirmed by reporting by renowned media outlets such as USA Today and AP .

In addition, regular safety reports from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Covid vaccines, with the benefits clearly outweighing the potential risks.

analysis

The spread of this fabricated story shows how easily misinformation can gain traction and spread on social media. Especially in times of a pandemic, it is important to rely on reliable sources and to critically question such unfounded claims. The role of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the anti-vaccination movement and the associated spread of disinformation underscores the importance of an enlightened public and the responsibility of each individual to carefully examine information.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his role in the anti-vaccination movement

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a prominent figure in the US environmental movement and a member of the famous Kennedy family. Originally known as a lawyer and environmental activist, over the years he has gained increasing attention in the debate about vaccines and their safety. Kennedy Jr. is the nephew of former US President John F. Kennedy and the son of former US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, which gives his statements a special public perception.

Kennedy Jr. has established himself as a central figure in the anti-vaccination movement in the USA in recent years. He founded and heads the organization “Children's Health Defense,” which officially advocates for the safety of vaccines and against so-called forced vaccinations. The organization regularly disseminates material linking vaccines to various health risks, although many of these claims have been refuted by the scientific community.

Kennedy Jr.'s transition from environmental activist to anti-vaccination activist has surprised many and drawn criticism, especially from those who admired him for his previous contributions to the environmental movement. His statements and those of his organization are widely disseminated due to his prominent position and the large platforms available to him. This gives the anti-vaccination movement more visibility and influence, especially on social media.

Comparing U.S. and European Vaccine Safety Surveillance

Monitoring and evaluating the safety of vaccines is a critical aspect of public health that is carried out with the greatest care and accuracy worldwide. In Europe, this task is mainly carried out by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), an authority responsible for the scientific evaluation, monitoring and safety review of medicines. The EMA carries out comprehensive assessments of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before they are approved for the European market. After approval, the EMA continuously monitors the safety of the vaccines by collecting and analyzing data on possible side effects.

In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) takes on a similar role. As a federal agency, the FDA is responsible for testing and approving drugs, including vaccines, for the US market. Before approving a vaccine, the FDA conducts rigorous clinical trials and monitors post-approval safety through various surveillance systems and programs. This includes the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a reporting system for adverse events following vaccination that allows safety signals to be quickly identified and investigated.

Both the EMA and the FDA work with a high level of transparency and scientific integrity to ensure that all vaccines made available to the population are safe and effective. Authorities regularly publish updates and reports on their assessments and findings, ensuring a high level of confidence in the vaccines. Close collaboration between international health authorities such as the EMA and the FDA enables effective information sharing and contributes to the global safety of vaccines. This collaborative approach strengthens the global response to infectious diseases and is critical to protecting public health worldwide.

Information about the development and approval of Covid vaccines

The development and approval of Covid vaccines is an unprecedented scientific undertaking, carried out in record time and without compromising safety and effectiveness. The process begins with preclinical research, in which scientists test vaccine candidates in laboratory experiments and on animals to obtain initial evidence of effectiveness and safety.

If the preclinical results are positive, clinical studies follow, which are divided into three phases. In Phase I, the vaccines will be tested on a small group of volunteers to assess their safety and immune response. In Phase II, the study will be expanded to a larger group to determine dosage and further safety data. In Phase III, the vaccines will be tested on thousands of participants to comprehensively evaluate their effectiveness against the disease and possible side effects.

As soon as the data from the clinical trials are available and show a positive assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, the manufacturers submit an application for emergency approval or full approval to the relevant regulatory authorities, such as the FDA in the USA or the EMA in Europe. These authorities carefully review the data to ensure that the vaccine meets legal requirements for safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality. The vaccine may only be used in the respective region after thorough testing and approval by these authorities.

The development of the Covid vaccines was also supported by international collaboration and significant financial investment, which allowed some processes to be carried out in parallel rather than sequentially, without lowering scientific or regulatory standards. After approval, authorities and manufacturers continue to monitor the safety of the vaccines in order to identify and treat rare side effects. This comprehensive process ensures that the Covid vaccines made available to the public are not only effective but also meet the highest safety standards, helping to minimize reservations and concerns among the population.

Questions and answers about the Supreme Court rumor

Question 1: Has the Supreme Court made a ruling that does not recognize Covid vaccines as vaccines?
Answer 1: No, there is no such judgment. The claim has no basis.

Question 2: Is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. involved in such a ruling?
Answer 2: No, Kennedy Jr. has denied any involvement in this fabricated verdict.

Question 3: How is the safety of corona vaccines monitored?
Answer 3: Safety is closely monitored by, among others, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which regularly publishes safety reports.

Question 4: Are the allegations about the Supreme Court ruling true?
Answer 4: No, these claims are fictitious and have no basis.

Question 5: How should such claims be dealt with?
Answer 5: They should be questioned critically and only verified information from reliable sources should be used.

Conclusion

This case highlights the need to treat information critically and carefully examine the sources of such claims. We encourage readers to treat untested information with skepticism and to rely on valid, scientifically based information.

Source: dpa

Stay up to date and subscribe to our newsletter . We also invite you to participate in our monthly online lectures and workshops . Become part of our community that is committed to education and a critical approach to information on the Internet.

You might also be interested in:
Turbo cancer caused by COVID vaccination: fact or fiction?
RKI files scandal?
A fact check The deaths of heads of state and the COVID-19 vaccination: conspiracy or coincidence?

Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )