In the digital age, in which online shopping is part of everyday life for many, the conscious use of platforms that try to tempt us to buy every day is becoming increasingly important. One such platform that is currently particularly in focus at vzbv is Temu. The online marketplace known for its association with cheap Chinese products is now in the spotlight because of serious allegations. The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) has warned Temu for practices that raise questions about transparency and fairness and thus test consumers' trust in the digital retail world.

Arbitrary discounts and lack of information

The vzbv's points of criticism of Temu are diverse and serious. In particular, the lack of transparency of the discount campaigns and the use of manipulative designs that are intended to entice people to make ill-considered purchases are the focus of criticism. Temu offers discounts of up to 70 percent without specifying reference prices or explaining the origin of these seemingly arbitrary discounts. This practice leaves many consumers unclear as to whether they are really getting a bargain or are falling victim to a sophisticated marketing strategy.

Manipulative designs in criticism

Another point that puts Temu in the crossfire of criticism is the use of so-called “dark patterns”. These design elements, which are intended to persuade the user to take a certain action using psychological tricks, can be found in the form of requests such as “Hurry up! “Over 126 people have this item in their shopping cart.” Such practices are not only ethically questionable, but have also been in direct contradiction to the EU's Digital Services Act since February 17, 2024.

Focus on consumer protection

The vzbv does not stop at warnings, but rather gives consumers practical tips for safer use of online marketplaces such as Temu. The recommendations include, among other things, checking the identity of the product providers and critically questioning reviews. These measures are crucial to protect consumers from potential traps and misleadings and provide them with a safer online shopping experience.

Questions and answers about the Temu case and the vzbv:

Question 1: Why was Temu warned by vzbv?
Answer 1: Temu was warned for non-transparent discounts and the use of manipulative designs.

Question 2: What are “Dark Patterns”?
Answer 2: “Dark patterns” are design elements that are intended to persuade the user to take a certain action using psychological tricks.

Question 3: How can consumers protect themselves when shopping online?
Answer 3: Consumers should check the identity of product providers and critically question reviews.

Question 4: What further steps is the vzbv planning against Temu?
Answer 4: The vzbv is considering a lawsuit against Temu after no cease-and-desist declaration was issued.

Question 5: What significance does the Temu case have for consumer protection?
Answer 5: The Temu case underlines the importance of transparency and fairness in online trading and shows how important active consumer protection is.

Conclusion

The Temu case highlights the need for a vigilant and critical approach to online shopping platforms. While digital marketplaces offer many advantages and conveniences, it is more important than ever to be aware of misleading practices and exercise your rights as a consumer. The work of organizations like vzbv is essential to protect consumers and make the retail landscape more transparent and fair. It remains to be hoped that cases like this not only contribute to education and awareness, but also lead to a lasting improvement in practices on online marketplaces.

We invite you to subscribe to the Mimikama newsletter at https://www.mimikama.org/mimikama-newsletter/ and to register for our online lectures and workshops at https://www.mimikama.education/online-vortrag- from-mimikama/ to register. Get actively involved in using digital media in a safe and enlightened manner.

Source: press release

You might also be interested in:

Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )