On March 9, 2017, Marcel H. was arrested for murdering a little boy and a young man. This double murder is currently shaking and shocking the entire German-speaking area!
But what shocks and devastates us just as much is the fact that someone is doing “like business” on Facebook about the death of the little boy Jaden.
Under the pretext of setting up memorial page a post was repeatedly edited by the administrator(s) - and this only to drive up the “LIKES”.
Various users who came across this page on Facebook drew our attention.
We are shocked by how unscrupulously and without any morals people are trying to get likes here.
It's this inconspicuous status post on the Facebook page: JADEN AUS HERNE
The post was liked over 3,700 times and shared over 82,000 times - and over 1,100 people commented on the status post.
At first glance, however, you can NOT recognize the “LIKE HORSE” of the admin. But if you click on the date/time, you can view the processing history in detail.
Here you can see that this was edited 11 times - and the number of likes increased:
This was changed again and again until we reached 100,000.
The status contribution was then reset to its original state.
Why do users do such things?
This is like lust and there are different forms!
How do you get people on Facebook and get them to share and like content? Quite simply: you touch them on an emotional level! Like hunters have recognized this for a long time and collect more interaction per status message than most people do in a lifetime.
This Facebook page has no respect for the suffering and feelings of the relatives. Those affected by the misfortune, in this case little Jaden, must not become victims a second time through the presentation of such sites.
Reporting this page to Facebook will make little to no sense.
Because it is very likely that it does not contradict Facebook's community standards. Even if we show the nasty and lousy business here transparently, Facebook won't give a damn about the way in which "likes" are MISUSED here.
UPDATE! After we published our report, the site decided to delete it!
But in what way?
Notes:
1) This content reflects the current state of affairs at the time of publication. The reproduction of individual images, screenshots, embeds or video sequences serves to discuss the topic. 2) Individual contributions were created through the use of machine assistance and were carefully checked by the Mimikama editorial team before publication. ( Reason )