The secret weaknesses of AI: When images are not “real”.

The stumbling blocks of modern artificial intelligence when generating images - a closer look at the problems that AI have when they generate images. The training data is particularly crucial. Training data is specific amounts of data that are used to train an artificial intelligence (AI) in its task. They serve as a textbook for the machine to help it understand what patterns and characteristics appear in different situations.

For example, when training an AI to generate images, one uses a large collection of images as training data. By studying these images, the AI ​​learns what different objects look like, what colors they are, and how light and shadow interact. The better and more diverse the training data is, the better the AI ​​can recreate different image scenarios. However, if the training data is limited or of poor quality, it can result in erroneous or unrealistic images.

Training data is the cornerstone for the performance of an AI. They provide the knowledge necessary for AI to perform its tasks and deliver high-quality results. When generating images, the quality of the training data directly influences how authentic and convincing the images generated by the AI ​​are. Nevertheless, there are recurring indicators that can be used to recognize artificially generated images!

The paradox of unrealistic textures

Artificial intelligences, shaped by immense amounts of data and algorithms, often develop an idiosyncratic understanding of textures and patterns. This leads to them producing image compositions that would hardly be conceivable in the real world. For example, imagine a Dalmatian whose characteristic points are not round, but angular like squares.

Or a riverbed where the flowing water looks like coarsely woven wool. Such illustrations illustrate how AIs reinterpret artistic space. It is not always easy to decide whether it is an expression of innovative creativity or an over-optimization of the machine. These blurring lines between reality and AI creation can often leave the viewer in a state of fascinated wonder.

Light and shadow in chaos

In visual art, light and shadow give life to images. They convey feeling, set accents and create perspective. But artificial intelligence, despite its ability to generate complex visualizations, shows notable weaknesses in this regard. Consider an AI-generated sunset:

The brightness of the sky may be captivating, but shadows and light may seem strangely inconsistent. If shadows fall in the wrong direction or the light source is obviously misplaced, it can significantly affect the authenticity of an image. Instead of creating a realistic impression, these details create an incongruous and sometimes unreal atmosphere. It seems as if the AI ​​is playing with the basic rules of light physics and producing images that correspond more closely to a dream world than to our real surroundings. It reveals that AIs, however advanced, still struggle to correctly interpret the subtle nuances and rules of the natural world.

Unforeseen mergers

In the innocent minds of children, the idea of ​​an elephant with the shimmering wings of a butterfly can make perfect sense. It is a product of pure imagination where the impossible becomes possible and each composite image has its own magic.

But when such ideas fall into the hands of artificial intelligence, they are often visualized in unexpected ways. AI, powered by data and algorithms, generates such compositions without regard to natural conditions or context. While for us humans such fusions can evoke stories and emotions, AI lacks this deep meaning. The end product is often images that, although detailed, seem strange and testify to the machine logic that produced them. It's a strange mix that shows how far AI is from a true understanding of our world and our ideas. It is a striking example of how pure computing power does not always lead to meaningful or understandable results.

Contextual capers

The natural world organizes its inhabitants into carefully coordinated ecosystems, with each living creature occupying a specific place in its environment. In contrast, artificial intelligences, which are equipped with the ability to process vast amounts of image information, sometimes seem to lose their orientation. The result? A whale that seems to get lost and appears in the middle of a desert landscape or penguins that have uncharacteristically perched on tropical tree branches.

While these digital creations may be impressive at first glance, they also reveal a fundamental flaw in the way AI processes things. Although the technology behind it is capable of depicting details with precision, it lacks a deeper understanding of the context and natural relationships in the environment. Reminiscent of mistakes rather than artistic intent, these images often seem out of place and surreal. It turns out that despite their computational power and analytical potential, AIs still struggle to fully grasp the complexities and nuances of the real world.

The case of the lost body parts

Within the images created by artificial intelligence, we sometimes encounter representations that the human eye perceives as incomplete or disproportionate. A common problem is characters whose body parts are missing or whose proportions deviate greatly from what we would consider “normal”. It can happen that a generated figure is suddenly shown without eyes, which can create a disturbing impression in human perception. Likewise, arms that seem to end up in the air without any aim or purpose are often found in images generated by AI.

Such depictions are not just random bloopers or creative deviations. Rather, they are indicators of the challenges that AI systems face when generating images. The absence of body parts or the incorrect arrangement of them reflects the difficulties that the algorithms have in interpreting and synthesizing complex, human or life-like forms. It is a powerful reminder that, despite impressive advances in artificial intelligence, algorithms still struggle to capture the intricacies and nuances embedded in the natural world and human perception. It highlights how complex and challenging the task of creating realistic and error-free representations is, even for the most advanced AI models.

The echo of duplicates

When it comes to creating images, artificial intelligence systems have their own, often predictable, idiosyncrasies. Despite their enormous record memory and computing capacity, these systems tend to use certain structures and patterns repeatedly. This can lead to similar or even identical patterns appearing in different images that appear familiar to the viewer. This lack of variety and novelty can create a feeling of déjà vu, where you feel like you've seen the same thing before.

This repetitive behavior is not just a quirk or quirk, but an expression of the way these algorithms are trained and work. AI models draw their “inspiration” from the data they were trained on. If certain patterns or structures dominate in this data, the AI ​​will tend to favor those patterns in its creations. This can result in the creative potential hoped for from such advanced technologies being limited by repetitive and overly familiar representations.

In practical terms, this means that despite the sheer volume of images an AI can generate, it does not necessarily guarantee equivalent diversity or originality in the results. It also raises questions about the quality and versatility of the training data used to shape and guide AI's creative abilities. It is living proof that no matter how advanced an AI may be, its capabilities are still limited by the quality and diversity of the data it is fed.

A fuzzy dilemma

In art, blurring, or the deliberate omission of details, is often a deliberate stylistic device used by the artist to evoke certain emotions, draw focus to certain areas of the image, or simply convey a particular aesthetic. Artists use this technique to give the viewer room for interpretation or to create a certain mood.

In artificial intelligence products, however, uncertainty often does not arise from a conscious decision. Instead, it may be the result of limitations in the algorithms or the underlying data. While a blurry image in human art can be the product of intention, in AI-generated art it often indicates a problem in the generation process.

A blurry or low-detail image generated by an AI can have various causes. For example, it could be that the algorithm does not have enough information to correctly represent a particular detail. Or the algorithm has difficulty deciding between different possible representations of an object or scene and therefore chooses a “middle ground” that results in a blurry representation.

Such blurring or lack of detail can significantly reduce the value of an image. In a world where photorealistic renderings are often the desired ideal, an image that is blurry or lacking in detail can quickly be perceived as inferior or flawed. The question arises as to how AI developers and AI artists deal with this problem and whether future generations of AI algorithms will be able to overcome such shortcomings.

Anatomical abnormalities: Long fingers, curved legs

Representing human limbs, especially complex structures like fingers, is a real challenge for AI systems that generate images. A primary reason for this is the inherent complexity of the shape and movement of our hands and fingers. The human hand can assume an incredible variety of positions and postures, and correctly capturing this range of movements in a generated image requires a deep understanding and extensive amount of data.

In addition, AI models learn from the data available to them. If a database used to train the model contains inadequate or blurry images of hands and fingers, the AI ​​will likely have difficulty reproducing them correctly. And then there's the phenomenon of overgeneralization: Instead of learning a specific hand position or structure, the AI ​​might be tempted to create a kind of "average hand" or "average finger." She often combines elements from different images, which can lead to unrealistic or distorted representations.

Smaller details, such as those in fingers and their joints, can also be lost in AI image generation, especially if the model does not have the required resolution or level of detail. Once the image generation process begins, these systems often work step by step, building up the image little by little. A small error at the beginning can increase as this process progresses, ultimately resulting in more noticeable distortions or “pulled” representations.

Nevertheless, it is expected that with the further development of AI technologies and better training data, such problems will be minimized in the future.

Look carefully, understand AI!

Artificial intelligence systems open up new horizons in image design. They are able to create complex landscapes, create portraits, or even create entirely new forms of art. A first look at these AI-generated images could lead the viewer to believe that they could have come from a human artist, so authentic and detailed they often appear.

But this is where the paradox begins. AI's ability to construct an image is not based on sensation, experience or intuition, as would be the case with a human artist, but rather on algorithms, data sets and machine learning. And while these algorithms are capable of handling incredibly complex tasks, they lack the ability to see the “whole” in context or to interpret the unwritten and often subtle rules of art and aesthetics.

The result? While many images produced by AI systems may appear flawless at first glance, upon closer inspection they often reveal strange anomalies. A character might have unnaturally proportioned limbs, a landscape painting might show elements in an inappropriate context, or light and shadow might be depicted in a way that defies physical laws.

These small inconsistencies and deviations are more than just simple errors. They offer insights into how AI systems work and reveal the mechanical and algorithmic processes behind such works of art. It becomes clear that despite all the advances in AI technology, creating art – be it visual, musical or literary – remains a complex affair that requires both science and intuition. While AI systems can expand and enrich the world of art and photography, these small imperfections and inconsistencies urge caution and remind us to remain ever vigilant and critical of what these technologies present to us.

Mimikama.education

can impart media literacy through targeted lectures and workshops. Various target groups such as students, teachers and parents can be reached and sensitized. How do search engines work?

How can I search images? These techniques are particularly helpful for exposing fakes, hoaxes or dangerous hoaxes. NEW! Geoguessing workshops at Mimikama! Turn the search for truth into an exciting adventure with our geoguessing workshop!

Very exciting! Wind power: Facts debunk CO₂ myths