No more political content on Instagram and threads

Instagram and Threads, two of the most prominent social networks of our time, have announced a significant direction in their content strategy. In a world characterized by political unrest and a seemingly endless flow of news, these platforms have decided to take a different approach. The decision to remove political content from their recommendation algorithms marks a major turning point not only for the platforms themselves, but also for the way we consume and understand social media.

A decision of great consequence

The decision is much more than just a change in algorithms, it reflects the current social debate about the role of social media in politics. Instagram boss Adam Mosseri justifies the move with the high costs that political content brings with it for moderation and the general well-being of the community. The decision to only make political content visible upon request signals a profound change in the company's philosophy. It raises questions about the responsibility of social networks to disseminate a wide range of content and the way these platforms influence public debate.

The community's reaction

Reactions to this decision have been mixed, ranging from approval to strong criticism. Many see this as a step towards a healthier, less polarized online environment. Others criticize that this decision could limit the reach of important political discussions and trap users in a bubble of easy-to-consume, harmless content. The fact that users now have to take action to view political content raises questions about individuals' engagement and willingness to engage with complex issues.

The role of content creators

This change represents a particular challenge for content creators. They must now decide whether to follow the new guidelines and distance themselves from political content or whether to accept the possible consequences of reduced visibility and reach. Instagram and Threads' decision could change the long-term social media landscape by redefining what type of content is successful and what strategies creators use.

Questions and answers about Instagram and politics:

Question 1: Why does Instagram remove political content from its recommendations?
Answer 1: Instagram justifies this decision by saying that political content requires a lot of moderation effort and the platform does not make any money from political debates.

Question 2: How can users continue to see political content on Instagram?
Answer 2: Users must manually activate their wish to see political content in the settings.

Question 3: What impact does this change have on content creators?
Answer 3: Creators who post political content could have their visibility limited if they do not adapt their content to the new guidelines.

Question 4: What is the biggest criticism of this decision?
Answer 4: Critics fear that this decision limits the distribution of important political information and pushes users into a bubble of non-political content.

Question 5: What does Instagram say about the long-term goal of this change?
Answer 5: Instagram's goal is to create a less aggressive, more community and lifestyle-oriented platform that is not primarily politically oriented.

Conclusion

Instagram's decision to remove political content from recommendations represents a turning point that could have far-reaching consequences for the platform, its users and society at large. While some welcome the development towards a non-political, lifestyle-oriented platform, others see it as a threat to democratic debate and freedom of information. Whatever the point of view, it is clear that this decision will spark a profound debate about the role and responsibility of social media in our society. It's a call to action to actively advocate for the kind of digital space we want, whether through conscious hiring decisions or through participation in public discourse.

We invite everyone interested to subscribe to the Mimikama newsletter attend our online lectures and workshops

Source: derstandard

Also read:

• iFightDepression: 10,000 users find help online
• Fake shops: The scam with the name
• AI labels: Meta's innovations for more transparency